Special Report

Join our Mailing List

Sign up to receive important health alerts and special offers.

Name
Email
Success Stories

“People think I look great without knowing what I’ve done. The glow in my face tells it all—I have younger looking skin now, and feel younger too.”J.B. - Orlando, Florida

read more...


“I had abused my skin over the years with too much sun and smoking, anvd I’m very pleased with how much restoration was achieved.”S.U., New Mexico

read more...


Dear Dr. Murray,I have been running for more than 30 years. At 50, I stopped running competitively but continued to log miles at a leisurely pace. I run 3-4 days and rest one. Late December, just after my 61st birthday, I started taking the TelemoRx bovine colostrum, 2 caps twice a day. Wow! What a great product. In January I ran 16 days without a rest and my legs and body feel great. ...

read more...


To Take or Not to take Estrogen – That is the question

Print This Post Print This Post

In 1991 the Women’s Health Initiative was begun to see if post menopausal women were befitting from taking estrogen. This was a $725 million dollar project involving 27,000 women. Abruptly in 2002 the NIH (National Institutes of Health) stopped the study and announced that estrogen hormones were increasing the rates of heart attacks.  Millions of women abruptly stopped their estrogen therapy and looked for another means to control their symptoms. Now in a major flip flop new analysis has emerged showing that estrogen may be beneficial for people early in menopause, that is the first ten years of menopause. The new data shows that women aged 50-59 who took estrogen had a 30% lower risk of dying, 10-19 years into menopause had a 22% increased risk,  but if you were over  20 years into menopause and continued to take estrogen you had a 71% increased risk of death .

The problem with this entire study appears to be that the average age was 63 and only about 10% of the women were in their first ten years of menopause. Before this data can be widely disseminated it has to get the approval of the AMA and its publication JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association). And herein lies the problem. Apparently JAMA has tightened up the statistical requirements for the data to be “statistically significant”.  In technical jargon they are now requiring a P value of .01 not the usual .05. And to put that in layman’s terms for every 10,000 women aged 50-59 who use hormones there would be 10 fewer deaths and in women aged 70-79 there would be 16 additional deaths. Now you don’t have to be a statistician to realize that someone here has a vested interest to get this published and therefore into mainstream medicine as “evidence based medicine”, the new jargon to justify prescription filling. My personal take is if you have to take hormones make sure they are human bio-identical and be judicious – you should not substitute a pill for proper diet and life style.